Family and Consumer Science (Home Economics) · PLECK lesson

PLECK lesson 137 · suggested week 28, day 2

Describe a problem with an I-statement

Objective. Describe a problem with an I-statement:apply the stated method to a concrete case,produce the requested evidence,and justify safe,private,and accessible choices.

About 25–50 minutes. The due date is chosen by a parent.

Split across sittings as needed;no timer or required date.Adult approval remains required even for independent work.

Materials: paper, pencil, optional calculator.

An I-statement names an observable event, its effect or feeling, and a specific request. Avoid disguising blame as“I feel that you are lazy.”Focus on the current issue and a realistic change. Tone and timing matter; pause if discussion becomes unsafe or overwhelming. Class uses imaginary chores, not required personal disclosures or confrontation. Safety and boundaries: Fictional people or paper characters only. No real child/older adult recording, sole supervision, feeding, medicine, bathing, lifting, transport, diagnosis, or intimate care. A responsible adult retains all real caregiving duties. Family-only evidence;use fictional details,no faces or private records.No purchases are required.

Worked example

Unscored model for discussion;use the assignment case for your own work.

“When supplies stay on the table, I have less work space. Could we put them away after the project?”describes an event and request.

Describe a problem with an I-statement — evidence and reflection

  1. 1. Rewrite“You never help”as a specific I-statement about a fictional cleanup task.
  2. 2. Write one example that sounds like an I-statement but still contains blame; repair it.
  3. 3. Create a short spoken or written request with a clear task boundary and time agreement.
  4. 4. Explain when pausing and asking a trusted adult is safer than continuing an argument.
  5. 5. Spiral review — A 40 item has 25%discount, then fictional 10%tax on discounted price. Find total. Spiral review.

Acceptance checks

An adult supervises. This stays in the family. Spending is not required.

For any optional food,adult verifies all ingredients and established allergy needs;avoid cross-contact,no tolerance tests,and use paper food if uncertain.For clothing/cleaning,adult checks sensitivities and labels;no chemical mixing.

Fictional people or paper characters only. No real child/older adult recording, sole supervision, feeding, medicine, bathing, lifting, transport, diagnosis, or intimate care. A responsible adult retains all real caregiving duties.

Complete the entire task using paper diagrams,fictional data,empty/inactive tools,and parent-observed explanation.

  • No unsupervised heat,sharp tools,cleaners,or appliances.
  • No raw-meat handling,unsafe food tasting,chemical mixing,flame/smoke experiments,or electrical repair.
  • No real childcare/medical/intimate care,financial transactions,credentials,private records,or public posting.

If this is still shaky. Use this lesson’s worked model to make a three-box process card.Label the goal,one safety/constraint check,and the evidence you would show.Explain it to a parent before trying the main task again.

Optional extra. Change one fictional constraint in this lesson,such as available time,access,ingredient restriction,or pretend cost.Revise one artifact and show what must change and what safety/privacy rule stays fixed.

Name ____________________ Date ____________________