PLECK lesson 137 · suggested week 28, day
Project 14: Digital privacy, expression and responsible tools
Objective. Create a complete, privacy-safe digital privacy, expression and responsible tools project using six specified deliverables.
This is class practice, not legal advice. Do not file a real form, contact a court, or enter a real person’s legal information. A typed answer or paper is enough. Optional audio or video is a private file up to 4 MB.
About undefined minutes. The due date is chosen by a parent.
Materials: Paper or a text editor, Pencil or pen, Optional printer, Optional private recorder;equivalent text/in-person alternative always available, Supplied source cards;internet optional.
Digital legal literacy combines source verification, privacy, permission, context and law. A public-looking page does not make all personal data appropriate to collect or all media free to reuse. Consent has a scope; platform rules and legal rights are not identical. Copyright protects qualifying expression, while facts and ideas raise different questions. Fair use is a context-dependent four-factor analysis, not a fixed percentage or automatic education exception. Use invented accounts and original materials. Never enter another person’s account, collect a classmate’s data, publish work or upload private records for credit. Project brief: Design a fictional privacy-respecting legal-literacy webpage on paper or as text only. Include minimal-data fields, a scoped-permission notice, a source-verification checklist and a four-factor copyright analysis. No actual publication, account access or copied commercial worksheet. Build an educational artifact by organizing facts before recommending anything. A chart should label its columns; a map should explain its symbols; a memo should separate issue, rule, application and conclusion. If a fact is absent, write unknown rather than fill it in. A polished appearance never substitutes for accurate reasoning. Complete fictional fact bank: Case 1 — Consent has a defined scope Principle: Permission for one use does not automatically authorize every new use, recipient or duration. A privacy-sensitive design identifies what is needed and who can access it. Applicable law may impose additional requirements, and clicking a box does not settle every legal question. Original record: Fictional participants permit a private class audio practice. A club proposes posting the recording publicly as an advertisement. Changed record: The practice instead uses a teacher-written text transcript with invented speakers and no recording. Case 2 — Data minimization protects learning Principle: Collect only information necessary for a legitimate educational task. Birth dates, addresses, account identifiers and private experiences are rarely needed to analyze a fictional legal problem. De-identification can fail if details still identify a person; use genuinely invented records instead. Original record: A mock legal-research sheet asks for a learner’s home address and a family case number even though the task is to classify source types. Changed record: The sheet uses Fictional Record A and no identifying facts. Case 3 — Screenshots need context and provenance Principle: A digital image can be altered, cropped, mislabeled or out of date. Evaluate origin, completeness, date and corroboration before treating it as authority or proof. Do not use invasive methods to investigate; classroom provenance records are supplied and fictional. Original record: An image claims a new statute passed, but the visible heading says introduced bill. Changed record: The source card supplies an official enacted text and effective date. Case 4 — Ideas, facts and expression Principle: Copyright generally protects original expression rather than underlying ideas, systems or facts. Another person’s distinctive wording or illustration can still be protected even when the topic is factual. Attribution is good practice but does not itself grant permission. Original record: A learner writes an original explanation of the idea of a triangle, but wants to copy an entire distinctive paid illustration and says facts cannot be copyrighted. Changed record: The learner makes an original diagram using basic facts without tracing expressive artwork. Case 5 — Fair use requires four-factor reasoning Principle: The federal fair-use analysis considers purpose and character, nature of the copyrighted work, amount and substantiality, and effect on the potential market. No fixed word count, percentage or educational label guarantees the outcome. Courts evaluate the facts, and reasonable uncertainty should be stated. Original record: A learner proposes copying an entire current commercial workbook for distribution because the class is educational. Changed record: The learner instead quotes a short necessary passage for specific criticism with attribution and no market substitution supplied. Case 6 — AI text is not legal authority Principle: A fluent answer can contain invented cases, outdated rules or missing jurisdiction. Verify each legal claim and citation against reliable sources before using it; an AI summary is not a court, statute or lawyer. Do not input private facts or rely on a tool for personal legal decisions. Original record: A fictional AI output cites a case that the supplied official source card does not identify and gives no court, date or text. Changed record: An actual source text is supplied and the claimed proposition differs from its words. Method: First identify the actor and issue. Read the supplied principle as a limited model or overview, not a universal rule. Mark agreed facts, allegations and unknowns. Link a fact to each relevant condition. Consider a different interpretation and state a conditional conclusion when authority or facts are incomplete. Your reasons matter more than choosing a side. Use only the fictional record; no real case, private document or external contact is needed. Safety: Legal education only, not individualized legal advice. All disputes and records are fictional classroom simulations. Do not file, pay, contact police/courts/parties, visit a courthouse, investigate a real person, or disclose private family/case information. Use supplied facts; personal disclosure is never required. Written or private in-person alternatives replace every recording activity.
US foundations with Texas examples;federal procedure/evidence illustrations are not instructions for Texas filings. Supplied classroom rules are not invented statutes. Educational exercise only. This is not legal advice, a filing, or a result for a real person.
Worked example
A fictional artist permits private classroom display of a drawing. Selling it in a public advertisement changes purpose and audience. The original permission does not establish that broader authorization. Consent scope and any applicable legal requirements must be analyzed; the class can instead use an original invented graphic.
Project 14: Digital privacy, expression and responsible tools — reasoning record
- 1. Create a minimal-data fictional form for source classification.
- 2. Write a scoped-permission notice for private practice and explain why public ads differ.
- 3. Annotate a proposed-bill screenshot’s status error.
- 4. Compare original factual explanation with copied expressive artwork.
- 5. Complete a four-factor chart for copying the entire commercial workbook.
- 6. Create an AI-citation verification panel with a recording-free alternative.
Acceptance checks
- Respond to each numbered task with the required chart,calculation,explanation or script.
- For case-application tasks,connect the supplied principle to specific fictional facts and mark unknowns. For principle-only or source-card tasks,follow their stated scope;no extra case application is required.
- Keep personal information out of submissions and never send,file,pay or contact anyone for the exercise.
- Text,paper and private oral alternatives are evaluated for the same reasoning;no automatic passing policy is assigned.
A student may explain aloud to a parent. Submit typed numbered responses; or handwritten photo; or a printed page scanned as image/PDF; or a parent-paper completion log with the actual paper retained. Optional private audio/video may replace written explanation if each numbered task is identified. Each image/PDF/audio/video file must be at most 4 MiB and pass the app’s type/signature checks; use short clips or an equally detailed written script instead of a large file. An HTTPS reference may be stored as text only: it is not opened or evaluated automatically. Do not submit ZIP/code files or private records.
If this is still shaky. Read aloud or break the principle into conditions. A parent may scribe the learner’s reasoning. Retry the guided task before revising the original. Optional guided retry for Project 14: Digital privacy, expression and responsible tools: Fictional participants permit a private class audio practice. A club proposes posting the recording publicly as an advertisement. Read this principle: Permission for one use does not automatically authorize every new use, recipient or duration. A privacy-sensitive design identifies what is needed and who can access it. Applicable law may impose additional requirements, and clicking a box does not settle every legal question. Make two boxes:one supplied fact and one legal condition. Draw an arrow explaining their connection. State one thing the record does not establish.
Optional extra. Extend the reasoning,not the real-world risk;all added records remain clearly fictional. Optional transfer challenge for Project 14: Digital privacy, expression and responsible tools: Original: Fictional participants permit a private class audio practice. A club proposes posting the recording publicly as an advertisement. Changed fact: The practice instead uses a teacher-written text transcript with invented speakers and no recording. Write a two-column before/after analysis. Identify exactly what changed and what legal question remains. Suggest one fictional additional record that could clarify a genuinely missing fact,or explain why no additional fact is needed under a stipulated model. Do not create a real record,contact anyone or invent authority.
Turn in a typed answer, a JPEG, PNG, or WebP photo, a PDF scan, or an MP3, WAV, M4A, MP4, or WebM file up to 4 MB. A parent can log paper. One https address is stored as text and is not opened or run. Zip and code files are refused.
- US Copyright Office: What is Copyright?
Jurisdiction/scope: US federal official agency explanation Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 Reading purpose: Original expression, fixed works, exclusive rights and limitations; ideas are not protected as expression. Supplied offline source card Title: US Copyright Office: What is Copyright? Exact URL: https://www.copyright.gov/what-is-copyright/ Jurisdiction/scope: US federal official agency explanation Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 (America/Chicago CST; dated reading, not an ongoing guarantee) Reading purpose and limits: Original expression, fixed works, exclusive rights and limitations; ideas are not protected as expression. Outside browsing is supplemental. Use this printed metadata and the lesson’s original principle to complete the exercise offline. The complete card metadata,purpose and limits are printed here and in every workbook. No external page is needed to complete a source-card exercise.
· Opening this link does not submit the lesson. - US Copyright Office: Fair Use Index
Jurisdiction/scope: US federal official agency explanation Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 Reading purpose: Four-factor, case-specific analysis; no guaranteed word/page/percentage safe harbor. Index updatedNovember 2026. Supplied offline source card Title: US Copyright Office: Fair Use Index Exact URL: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/ Jurisdiction/scope: US federal official agency explanation Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 (America/Chicago CST; dated reading, not an ongoing guarantee) Reading purpose and limits: Four-factor, case-specific analysis; no guaranteed word/page/percentage safe harbor. Index updatedNovember 2026. Outside browsing is supplemental. Use this printed metadata and the lesson’s original principle to complete the exercise offline. The complete card metadata,purpose and limits are printed here and in every workbook. No external page is needed to complete a source-card exercise.
· Opening this link does not submit the lesson. - Texas Attorney General: Consumer Protection
Jurisdiction/scope: Texas official agency overview Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 Reading purpose: Education, complaints and public-interest civil enforcement; agency information is not private representation. Supplied offline source card Title: Texas Attorney General: Consumer Protection Exact URL: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/consumer-protection Jurisdiction/scope: Texas official agency overview Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 (America/Chicago CST; dated reading, not an ongoing guarantee) Reading purpose and limits: Education, complaints and public-interest civil enforcement; agency information is not private representation. Outside browsing is supplemental. Use this printed metadata and the lesson’s original principle to complete the exercise offline. The complete card metadata,purpose and limits are printed here and in every workbook. No external page is needed to complete a source-card exercise.
· Opening this link does not submit the lesson. - Texas State Law Library: Legal Research for Beginners
Jurisdiction/scope: Texas official public-library guidance Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 Reading purpose: Distinguishes primary law from explanatory secondary sources. Free public guide; account-only databases/books not required. Supplied offline source card Title: Texas State Law Library: Legal Research for Beginners Exact URL: https://guides.sll.texas.gov/legal-research-for-beginners Jurisdiction/scope: Texas official public-library guidance Source type: official-government-explanatory-overview Verified: 2026-11-07 (America/Chicago CST; dated reading, not an ongoing guarantee) Reading purpose and limits: Distinguishes primary law from explanatory secondary sources. Free public guide; account-only databases/books not required. Outside browsing is supplemental. Use this printed metadata and the lesson’s original principle to complete the exercise offline. The complete card metadata,purpose and limits are printed here and in every workbook. No external page is needed to complete a source-card exercise.
· Opening this link does not submit the lesson.
This is a preview. A parent assigns the lesson and chooses the due date after the student is enrolled. The answer key is not on this page.